The Concept
Competition
Merchant's Dilemma
Sources:
http://www.groupon.com/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ 2011/03/17/groupon-ipo- billions_n_837000.html
http://factoidz.com/miami- coupon-sites/
Groupon offers a local deal each day for a variety of cities. This deal is sold to the Groupon followers at a reduced price. Deals are heavily advertised through social media. Usually there is a minimum number of coupons that have to be sold before everyone can get it therefore people are encouraged to recommend the deal through Word of Mouth to secure it. The deals are bought online directly from the Groupon website and the vouchers can be redeemed within specific period of time. Groupon gets 50% of all the sales plus some percent for "pain and suffering" such as service charges, etc. A little over 45% goes directly to the featured business. The concept seemed to be working because just after 2 years after its launch, Groupon was offered $6 billion by Google. After the offer was rejected, there are now talks about valuing Groupon anywhere between $15 and $25 million .
Competition
However, the success of the company has led to creation of Groupon clones all over the world. There are several coupon websites that are successful in Miami for example: LivingSocial, Go Miami Card, Miami NewTimes Coupon Deals, ValPack, YMiami, Couptessa, etc. All of them offer similar services for the coupon purchasers, but work out different deals with merchants, either by offering more added value in the promotion like personalized coupon ads or a lesser percentage of coupon sales. Many of them also target specific niche markets, for example Couptessa offers fun deals specifically for city women. Besides competing for consumers as more and more Groupon-like sites will seek to gain consumers' attention, there will be an effort to get deeper and deeper discounts from businesses. It may work in the beginning, but over time this may backfire and undermine the ability of these sites to get businesses to participate in their features.
Merchant's Dilemma
The majority of small and median businesses need new customers when they just open up. A lot of them are short of "marketing" dollars. So they turn to Groupon for help. After the initial excitement passes they don't know whether it is a curse or a blessing. First, Groupon pushes them to be very aggressive in their offer. Meaning it obligates them to give the biggest possible discount, to the point where no margin can be made on the Groupon customers. Some other disadvantages are Greater expenses, brand dilution, attracting the wrong customers, less online traffic, and many others described in Top 10 Reasons Businesses Shouldn’t Use Daily Deal Sites Like Groupon to Advertise Locally by Kevin Eklund.
What's now?
While Groupon still brings in the biggest revenues in the market. Living Social now gets more traffic on its website. Groupon is also having all kinds of internal and PR problems. Its super bowl ads were deemed offensive - when it tried to place humor in every day life, but messed up this time with Tibet. You can watch the ad HERE. Timothy Hutton said "The people in Tibet are in trouble, but they still whip up an amazing fish curry!" After Groupon issued an apology but the damage was already done.
Groupon has also been accused of offering coupons that didn't save anyone money, but purchasers were directed to specific websites with inflated prices, making it look like Groupon actually did save it. It was also blamed for using very unclear language describing terms and conditioning in its offers.
Some of the accusations are disputable such as of one of Groupon's disgruntled customers, Anthony Ferreira of California filed a class action suit in federal court in the Southern District of California, citing that the Chicago based company issues Groupon “gift certificates” with relatively short expiration dates, knowing that many consumers will not use the gift certificates prior to that expiration date. In the complaint, which also names department store Nordstrom as a defendant, goes on to state that it is basically illegal under California law for Groupon to sell or issue gift certificates with expiration dates.
The legal document asserts that Groupon creates a sense of urgency to quickly purchase the gift certificates and that consumers are pressured and rushed into buying said gift certificates which contain “illegal” expiration dates. Lawsuit seems to be claiming that Groupon created its business with the devious and sole intent of bilking consumers out of their hard earned dollars and that the entire concept (one now worth billions) is such a scam that it’s a slap in the face to the current legislation regulating gift certificates. But such a suit also leaves the question; at what point does consumer responsibility and common sense need to kick in here?
It seems like Groupon had a great start with an amazing growth as a company and an innovative concept, however competition and the company's internal issues have to be faced and resolved in order for it to survive and continue growing.
http://www.groupon.com/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/
http://factoidz.com/miami-
http://www.couptessa.com/deals/city/miami?show_subscription=1
http://tomuse.com/daily-deal- sites-groupon-disadvantages- local-business-advertising/
http://tomuse.com/daily-deal-
http://www.businessinsider. com/livingsocial-groupons- biggest-competitor-now-gets- more-web-traffic-than-groupon- 2010-8